Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3571 (RAJ)

SUMAN MEENA W/O SURESH CHAND MEENA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/509/2026 · 2026-03-30

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13394] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 509/2026 1. Suman Meena W/o Suresh Chand Meena, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Denda, Dausa, District Dausa, Presently Resident Of Near T.v. Tower, Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.). Aadhar No. 2296-4748-8098 2. Suresh Chand Meena Son of Bhagwan Sahay Meena, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Near T.v. Tower, Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.) Aadhar No. 7654-0045-7165 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Dausa. 3. The Nodal Officer, S.P. Office, Dausa. 4. SHO Police Station Baswa, District Dausa. 5. Chand Singh Meena Son of Mangoli Ram Meena, Resident Of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 6. Lali Devi W/o Chand Singh Meena, Resident of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 7. Mohar Singh Meena Son of Mangoli Ram Meena, Resident of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 8. Dropadi Devi W/o Mohar Singh Meena, Resident of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 9. Sunil Meena Son of Chand Singh Meena, Resident of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 10. Samrat Meena Son Of Chand Singh Meena, Resident of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 11. Rohitash Meena Son of Mohar Singh Meena, Resident of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 12. Hariom Meena Son of Mohar Singh Meena, Resident of Denda Basedi, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 13. Jitendra Meena Son of Sitaram Meena, Resident of Aaliyapada, Dausa, District Dausa. 14. Rameshwar Meena Son of Sitaram Meena, Resident of Aaliyapada, Dausa, District Dausa. [2026:RJ-JP:13394] (2 of 3) [CRLW-509/2026] 15. Rinku Meena Son of Shivram Meena, Resident of Aaliyapada, Dausa, District Dausa. 16. Sunil Meena Son of Shivram Meena, Resident of Aaliyapada, Dausa, District Dausa. 17. Dr. Devi Sahay Meena, Resident of Gopalpura, Todabheem, District Karauli. 18. Anokhi Devi Meena W/o Harimohan Meena, Resident of Gerota, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 18 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Jhotwara, 27 A, Hari Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur on 27.02.2025 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Greater Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the [2026:RJ-JP:13394] (3 of 3) [CRLW-509/2026] petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 18 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Baswa, District Dausa, Rajasthan and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /282