Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35684 (MAD)

A.Anbuselvi v. R.Arumugam

CRP/1602/2026 · 2026-06-15

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No. 1602 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRP No. 1602 of 2026 A.Anbuselvi D/o.Aandisamy, No.317, Semboothi Post, Ponnamaravathi Tk, Pudukkottai 622 401. Now Currently res.at No.4 Avvaiyar St, Ambal Nagar, Ekkatuthangal, Chennai 32. ..Petitioner(s) Vs R.Arumugam S/o.Rasu, No.243, Poosari theru, Arungankaadu, Semboothi Post, Ponnamaravathi Tk, Pudukkottai 622 401. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Art. 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Fair and Decretal order dated 20.11.2025 passed in IA.No.1/2025 in OP.No.38/2025 by the Learned Principal Judge Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.Kathiresan For Respondent(s): Sole Respondent - REFUSED https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1602 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.P.No. 38 of 2025 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, the Revision Petitioner wife preferred this Civil Revision Petition. 2. Before the trial court, the revision petitioner wife filed an application in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in OP No. 38 of 2025 seeking for return of jewels and the same was dismissed by the Family Court holding that no document or bills were produced along with invoices in order to prove the jewels are belong to her. But, she is having valid documents to prove the same. Therefore, she prayed to set aside the findings of Family Court. 3.On perusal of records, the fact reveals that before the learned Family Court, inspite of service of notice, the respondent husband has not appeared. Already in the divorce petition also, the husband has not appeared. Therefore, an exparte order of divorce was granted. But, as on date, the return of jewels was not considered. Hence, the revision petitioner wife is to be given one more opportunity. Furthermore, even before this court, inspite of service of notice, the respondent husband has not appeared and the notice was returned as refused. Therefore, this Court is inclined to set aside the findings rendered in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.P.No.38 of 2025 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1602 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the application filed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 is remanded back to the Family Court. So also, the application filed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 is ordered to be reopened. The Family Court is directed to dispose the said application within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The Revision Petitioner is directed to submit valid documents while opportunity is given before the Family Court. Thereafter, the Family Court is directed to dispose the said application on merit. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No costs. 15-06-2026 RPP To The Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1602 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. RPP CRP No. 1602 of 2026 15-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis