IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 CWP-25700-2026 Date of Decision : August 18, 2026 SUNITA RANI AND OTHERS -PETITIONERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking a direction to the competent authority to decide their revision petition (Annexure P-6) within a time-bound period. 2. In compliance with the previous order dated 14.08.2026, learned State counsel has apprised the Court that, by virtue of Section 47-B of the Indian Stamp Act, as applicable to the State of Haryana, inserted vide the Haryana Act No.7 of 2020, the revisional jurisdiction has been further conferred upon the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority. 3. In view of the innocuous and bona fide prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, which has not been opposed by learned State counsel, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority to decide the petitioners’ revision petition within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy DEVINDER YADAV 2026.08.19 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-25700-2026 2 of this order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to parties. It is further directed that, until the revision is decided, no recovery shall be effected from the petitioners. (KULDEEP TIWARI) August 18, 2026 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.08.19 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment