Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 32
Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 339/2023 CrlM No. (823/2023) Jameer Singh …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. Mohammad Shareef ...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 28.09.2026
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier also there was no appearance.
2. In terms of an order dated 28.01.2026, the counsel for the petitioner was permitted to argue the case virtually or lay motion in this regard, however, there is no appearance.
3. Today, neither the petitioner nor his counsel are present. Also no leave has been sought to appear virtually.
4. It appears that petitioner has lost interest to pursue the matter further. Hence, dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 28.09.2026 Akhil Dev