Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3568 (DEL)

LAVANYA S AND ANR v. MR ASHOK KUMAR NAGAWAT VICE CHANCELLOR DSEU

CONT.CAS(C)/682/2026 · 2026-04-21

Sachin Datta

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026 $~116 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026 LAVANYA S AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. Puneet Rathi, Mr. Mohd. Shahrukh Qureshi, Advs. versus MR ASHOK KUMAR NAGAWAT VICE CHANCELLOR DSEU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shivendra Singh, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi, Ms. Aryama Singh Rajput, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.26255/2026 (Exemption) 2. The application stands disposed of. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 10.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 16959/2025. The said order reads as under:- CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026 Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:26:02 Signature Not Verified CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026 4. It transpires during the course of hearing that the representation of the petitioners has been disposed of by way of a speaking order. A copy of the speaking order has been handed over to the learned counsel for the Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:26:02 Signature Not Verified CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026 petitioners during the course of hearing. 5. As such the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed. No further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 21, 2026/uk By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:26:02