LAVANYA S AND ANR v. MR ASHOK KUMAR NAGAWAT VICE CHANCELLOR DSEU
CONT.CAS(C)/682/2026 · 2026-04-21
Sachin Datta
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3568 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3568 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026
$~116 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 +
CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026
LAVANYA S AND ANR
.....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra (Sr. Adv.) along
with Mr. Puneet Rathi, Mr. Mohd.
Shahrukh Qureshi, Advs.
versus
MR ASHOK KUMAR NAGAWAT VICE CHANCELLOR DSEU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shivendra Singh, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi, Ms. Aryama Singh Rajput, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.26255/2026 (Exemption)
2. The application stands disposed of.
3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 10.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 16959/2025. The said order reads as under:- CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026 Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:26:02 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026
4. It transpires during the course of hearing that the representation of the petitioners has been disposed of by way of a speaking order. A copy of the speaking order has been handed over to the learned counsel for the Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:26:02 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 682/2026
petitioners during the course of hearing.
5. As such the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed. No further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. The same is, accordingly, disposed of.
SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 21, 2026/uk
By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:26:02