MD SAMIRUDDIN @ MAHAMMAD SAMIRUDDIN MOMIN AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/121/2026 · 2026-02-04
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3568 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3568 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
04.02.2026 Serial no. 28 [G.S.D]
CRM (M) 121 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Farakka PS Case No. 335 of 2024 dated 22.09.2024 u/s 309(4) of the BNS (GR Case No. 3210 of 2024).
-And-
In the matter of : Md Samiruddin @ Mahammad Samiruddin Momin & Anr.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Sourat Nandy
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Subhamoy Bhattacharya Mr. Pratick Bose
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are similarly situated as the other accused persons who have been granted bail in CRM(M) 2135 of
2025. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that from the petitioner no.1 about Rs.35,000/- was recovered and from the petitioner no.2 not only about Rs. 4.78 lakh but also gold ornaments & silver were recovered. Having considered the complicity of both the petitioners, at this stage, I am inclined to release the petitioner no.1 on bail who is similarly placed as the other
2 accused persons who have been granted bail in CRM(M) 2135 of 2025. So far as the petitioner no.2 is concerned, his prayer for bail is rejected. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner no.1 is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner no.1 viz, Md Samiruddin @ Mahammad Samiruddin Momin shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Jangipur, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner no.1 shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned ACJM, Jangipur and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned ACJM, Jangipur. Accordingly, CRM(M) 121 of 2026 is partly allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
3