Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3568 (ALL)

JITENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/17765/2026 · 2026-05-05

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17765 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "(i) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS direct the Respondent No.2 to decide the Mutation Case No. 696 of 2022 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. smt. Gulab Kali), Computerized No. T20240203030, under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforementioned case is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Jitendra Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad