Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35677 (KAR)

SMT. GIRIJAMMA, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/24055/2026 · 2026-08-10

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529002026 NC: 2026:KHC:42305 WP No. 24055 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO 24055 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GIRIJAMMA, W/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT KODIHALLI, KODIHALLI COLONY, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. 2. SMT. NARASAMMA, W/O LATE PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT KODIHALLI, KODIHALLI COLONY, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. 3. SMT. RAMAKKA, W/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS RESIDING AT KODIHALLI, KODIHALLI COLONY, KUDUR HOBLI, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529002026 NC: 2026:KHC:42305 WP No. 24055 of 2026 MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.M. SRINIVASAREDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-562159. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-562159. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, MAGADI TALUK, MAGADI, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. 5. SMT. HUTCHCHAMMA, W/O LATE SHANKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT MUTHUSAGARA VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529002026 NC: 2026:KHC:42305 WP No. 24055 of 2026 6. SRI. SIDDARAJU, S/O LATE SHANKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT, MUTHUSAGARA VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. 7. SMT. MANJAMMA, D/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT MUTHUSAGARA VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. 8. SMT. SIDDARAMAKKA, W/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKAMASKAL VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-561101. 9. SMT. UMA, D/O LATE VEERA BHADRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BILIDEVALAYA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572130. 10. SRI. RAJU, S/O LATE VEERA BHADRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529002026 NC: 2026:KHC:42305 WP No. 24055 of 2026 RESIDING NEAR BILIDEVALAYA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11.11.2025 IN R.P./47/2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-E; QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2022 IN R.A./499/2017-18 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, petitioners are assailing the order dated 11.11.2025 in R.P.No.47/2023 passed by respondent No.2 and the order dated 12.12.2022 in R.A./499/2017-18 passed by respondent No.3 as per Annexures - E and D to the Writ Petition. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529002026 NC: 2026:KHC:42305 WP No. 24055 of 2026 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, petitioners are claiming right over the land in question based on unregistered Panchayat Parikat and further it is forthcoming that suit in O.S.No.442/2012 filed with regard to the subject land came to be disposed of by the competent Civil Court. In that view of the matter, as the petitioners and private respondents are claiming right over the land in question based on a common lineage, and therefore, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. It is the duty of the petitioners to establish right over the land in question in a manner known to law. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30