1 CGHC010295732022 2026:CGHC:39912 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4008 of 2022 1 - Vinitkant Netam S/o Late Bhoj Ram Netam Aged About 30 Years Caste Ghasia, Resident Of Dharam Nagar Pachpedi Naka, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Deputy Government Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 11/09/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the respondents. RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authority to issue Caste Certificate to the Petitioner. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents that the scheme of issue of Social Status Certificate is covered under the Chhattisgarh Public Service Guarantee Act, 2011, where the Competent Authority has to submit the application before 30 days from the date of receipt of the application. Have to check. The respondents should be disposed of within the stipulated time. 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief or pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice.” 2. None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, the relief sought by the petitioner has already been rendered infructuous and, therefore, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the respondent/State and there being no appearance on behalf of the petitioner to controvert the same, no further adjudication survives for consideration in the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi