[2026:RJ-JP:8059] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 221/2026 1. Beena Meena D/o Shri Ladduram Meena W/o Shri Lokesh Meena, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Lokesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bamanheri, Dausa, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan 3. Superintendent Of Police/nodal Officer, Dausa, District Dausa. 4. S.h.o Police Station - Ramgarh Panchwara, District - Jaipur 5. Ladduram Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 6. Ramjilal Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 7. Girraj Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 8. Arjun Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 9. Laxminarayan Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 10. Shankar Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 11. Hanuman Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District - Dausa, Rajasthan 12. Hari Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District -Dausa, Rajasthan 13. Kailash Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District -Dausa, Rajasthan 14. Kamlesh Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 15. Suresh Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District [2026:RJ-JP:8059] (2 of 4) [CRLW-221/2026] -Dausa, Rajasthan 16. Mukesh Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District -Dausa, Rajasthan 17. Sitaram Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District -Dausa, Rajasthan 18. Ramdhan Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District - Dausa, Rajasthan 19. Mangilal Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District - Dausa, Rajasthan 20. Ajay Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District -Dausa, Rajasthan 21. Sanwalram Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District - Dausa, Rajasthan 22. Ramphool Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District Dausa, Rajasthan 23. Jagdish Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District -Dausa, Rajasthan 24. Puniram Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District - Dausa, Rajasthan 25. Vishnu Meena, R/o Bedada Ki Dhani, Kanwarpura, District -Dausa, Rajasthan 26. Ramvilash Meena, R/o Bamanheri, District - Dausa. 27. Bhagchand Meena, R/o Indawa, Lalsot, District - Dausa 28. Babulal Meena, R/o Kalipatiya, District - Dausa 29. Rakesh Meena, R/o Bichya, District Dausa 30. Kajod Meena, R/o Rampura, District - Dausa 31. Shankar Meena, R/o Manpuriya, District - Dausa ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 20/02/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:8059] (3 of 4) [CRLW-221/2026] 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 5 to 31 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 20.01.2026 at Arya Samaj Moti Katala Jaipur Rajasthan and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Kishanpole Zone, Jaipur, Rajasthan. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 5 to 31 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will [2026:RJ-JP:8059] (4 of 4) [CRLW-221/2026] provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu /22