Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010442352022 NC: 2026:KHC:43844 WP No. 19313 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19313 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. KALAVATHI W/O MUNINARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT OLD MILK DAIRY, NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE, KATARI PALYA, KOLAR CITY-563101.
2.
SMT RAJESHWARI W/O VENKATACHALAPATHY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT POLICE NANJAPPA COMPOUND, 4TH CROSS, GOWRIPET, KOLAR CITY-563101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S VISWESWARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010442352022 NC: 2026:KHC:43844 WP No. 19313 of 2022
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563101.
3.
THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO D.C. AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, D.C.OFFICE, KOLAR-563101.
4.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563101.
5.
THE TAHSILDAR KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563101.
6.
THE SURVEY SUPERVISOR KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR-563101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN CASE NO.JI.BHU.REVISION-10/2018-19 DATED 18/11/2019 AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN CASE NO.BHU.U.NI:APPEAL:69/2015-16 DATED 18/10/2016 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - A AND B RESPECTIVELY BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010442352022 NC: 2026:KHC:43844 WP No. 19313 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 18.11.2019 passed by respondent No. 2, produced at Annexure-A, and the order dated 18.10.2016, passed by the respondent No.3 produced at Annexure-B.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is noticed that respondent No. 2 has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal under Section 56 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, against the
order passed by respondent No.3. Therefore, the petitioners have to approach the Joint Director of Land
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010442352022 NC: 2026:KHC:43844 WP No. 19313 of 2022
Records, Bengaluru, challenging the order dated 18.10.2016 at Annexure-B.
4. Accordingly, the order dated 18.11.2019 at Annexure-A is hereby set aside, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority, as stated above, challenging the
order dated 18.10.2016 at Annexure-B.
5. It is further observed that the time spent by the petitioners before this Court shall be condoned, in the event, the petitioner approaches the competent authority within an outer limit of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16