Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2075 of 2017 ====================================================== Dauli Kumari Wife of Sanjiv Kumar, resident of Village- Adauri, P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director Integrated Child Development Scheme, Old Secretariat, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Sheohar.
4. The Child Development Project Officer, Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.
5. The District Programme Officer, Sheohar.
6. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Adauri, District- Sheohar.
7. The District Programme Officer, Sheohar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s) :-
“1. That by this writ application the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Hon'ble Court inter-alia, to issuence of writ in nature of mandamous or any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions and commanding the respondent authorities to make a direction for the processes of an appointment of Anganwari sevika within stipulated period with regard to the Memo No. dated /07/13. issued by the District Magistrate, Sheohar which was pending since
Patna High Court CWJC No.2075 of 2017(4) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 long time and any other/others relief/reliefs as your Lordships may deem fit and proper.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter raised in the instant application having become infructuous with the passage of time, the petitioner does not press the instant case and seeks permission to withdraw the application.
4. In view of the above, without entering into the merits of the case of the petitioner, the writ application stands
disposed of as withdrawn.
Shiv/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U