IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14880 of 2016 ====================================================== Ramesh Singh son of Late Mahesh Singh, resident of village-Raipur Bandhwa, Police Station-Haspura, District-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 3. The Additional District Magistrate, Revenue, Aurangabad. 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad. 5 The Circle Officer, Haspura, Aurangabad. 6. Bujhawan Dusadh son of Late Laxman Dusadh, resident of village-Raipur Bandhwa, P.O.-Rampur Chai, Police Station-Deokund (Goh), District- Aurangabad. 7. Ramdeo Dusadh son of Late Bhadai Dusadh, resident of village-Raipur Bandhwa, P.O.-Rampur Chai, Police Station-Deokund (Goh), District- Aurangabad. 8. Bhaju Dusadh son of Late Bhadai Dusadh, resident of village-Raipur Bandhwa, P.O.-Rampur Chai, Police Station-Deokund (Goh), District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Priyadarshi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md.Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 31-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) to command the respondents and direct them to take measurement of the lands Patna High Court CWJC No.14880 of 2016(5) dt.31-01-2026 2/3 appertaining to khata no. 78 particularly in respect of plots no. 1225 and 1235 (old plot no. 411) having area of 38.86 acres, falling under Mauza Raipur Bandhwa, Thana no. 226, police station- Haspura, district-Aurangabad, and further direct them to demarcate the lands according to respective shares being held by the title holders. (ii) to order the respondents to demarcate the lands of the petitioner from kahata no. 78 and plot nos. 1225 and 1235 (old plot no. 411) abovementioned and carve out his share of 3.06 acres of which petitioner has been enjoying undisputed title. (iii) to command the respondents and order them to ensure that petitioner is allowed to enjoy his title over land in question and continue with his possession and further prevent private respondents from disturbing with his possession over the lands in question those in garb of purchas for settlement being issued in theirs' favor in plot no. 411 of khata no. 78 have been Patna High Court CWJC No.14880 of 2016(5) dt.31-01-2026 3/3 from time to time disturbing and threatening to dispossess him. (iv) for issuance of any other writ/order/direction to which the Petitioner is found entitled to in the eye of law.” 3. In this case on 02.12.2025, four weeks’ time was granted to file substitution petition. 4. As it was a peremptory order and not complied, it stood dismissed on 05.01.2026. 5. Perused the file, consigned. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U