Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35651 (PAT)

Abdul Razak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/15024/2016 · 2026-02-03

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15024 of 2016 ====================================================== Abdul Razak Son of Late Rasul Mian Resident of village - Bishunpur Tara, P.O. Gulbara, P.S. Madhuban, District East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah 3. The Anchaladikari, Mahduban Anchal, East Champaran 4. Nazir Mian Son of Late Sakur Mian @ Abdul Sakur 5. Hafiz Mian Son of Late Rasul Mian Both residents of village - Bishunpur Tara, P.O. Madhuban, P.S. Gulbara, District East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha- Sc19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 03-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of mandamus, directing respondent nos. 1 to 3 to remove encroachments created by private respondent nos. 4 and 5 from 5 dhur of land under khata no. 100 khesara no. 265, which was part of the basgit land measuring about 3 decimal of land, in respect of which the Patna High Court CWJC No.15024 of 2016(4) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 petitioner was holding parcha under Sub- Rule 5 of Rule 5 of the under Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Rules, 1948. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate authority/Court for the redressal of the grievance against respondent nos. 4 and 5. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. Granting said liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority/Court for the redressal of the grievance, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U