Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3565 (AP)

RAVI SUNIL v. THE STATE OF A.P., & ANOTHER

CRLRC/3133/2016 · 2026-06-29

Subhendu Samanta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026 Date of uploading : 30.06.2026 APHC010583642016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3133/2016 Between: 1. RAVI SUNIL, S/0 YESURATNAM AGED 23 YEARS OCC; STUDENT, R/O SAKINETIPALLI LANKA VILLAGE, SAKINETIPALLI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, BY SUB-DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, AMALAPURAM, REP. THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. GOLLAMANDALA SUMS, D/O. RAMAKRISHNA, R/O.SAKINETIPALLI LANKA VILLAGE, SAKINETIPALLI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the 2 SS,J CRL.R.C.No.3133 of 2016 Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the orders dated 22-11-2016 in Crl.M.P.No.1045 in POCSO SC No. 16 /2016 on the file of the Court of the Ist Addl. District & Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 4903 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in POCSO SC No. 16 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the 1st Addl. District & Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2690 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/defacto complainant to compromise her case in POCSO S.C.No. 16 of 2016 on the file of the First Addl. District Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry and acquit the accused and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 SS,J CRL.R.C.No.3133 of 2016 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3133/2016 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant Criminal Revision case has become infructuous. The accused was acquitted by the learned Court below, so it is not necessary to proceed further in this Criminal Revision. 2. Heard learned counsel and perused the papers. It appears that the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against the order dated 22.11.2016 in Crl.M.P. No.1045 in POCSO Sessions Case No.16 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari, Rajamahendravaram. It appears that the learned Trial Court has dismissed discharge petition filed by the present petitioner/accused, against which instant Criminal Revision Petition has been filed. Perused the copy of the order placed across the Bench by learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the accused was acquitted from the case, having been found not guilty, by the learned Trial Court. 4 SS,J CRL.R.C.No.3133 of 2016 3. Considering the same, nothing remains to be decided by this Court in respect of the illegality and impropriety of the impugned order of discharge. 4. Accordingly, instance Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:30.06.2026 CMK Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 5 SS,J CRL.R.C.No.3133 of 2016 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3133/2016 Dated:30.06.2026 CMK