Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35644 (CAL)

SOURABH MUKHERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2097/2026 · 2026-08-25

Ajay Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.08.2026 Item No. 12 Ct. No. 39 C.R.M.(A) 2097 of 2026 AN (REJECTED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Burdwan Police Station Case No. 832 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026 under Sections 329(4) / 115(2) / 118(2) / 109(1) / 308(5) / 79 / 351(2) / 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2626 of 2026. In the matter of : Sourabh Mukherjee … Petitioner. Mr. Kallol Kr. Basu Mr. Anindya Sundar Das Mr. Jamat-Ul-Firdous Mr. Rajsekhar Hota Ms. Paramita Mondal Ms. Shabnam Yeasmin …for the Petitioner. Mr. Aditya Ratan Tiwary …for the State. 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case although he is in no way connected with the alleged offence. He prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioner on any terms and conditions. 2. On the other hand, learned advocate representing the State produces the memo of evidence and the case diary, and relies upon the statement of the witnesses recorded and the injury report. He opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 2 3. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusing the materials available on record, the case diary, including the statement of the witnesses recorded, the injury report and the F.I.R., this Court finds that there is sufficient material against the present petitioner. 4. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail in favour of the present petitioner, and the prayer for anticipatory bail is thus, rejected. 5. C.R.M.(A) 2097 of 2026 stands dismissed. 6. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 7. The concerned Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)