Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35643 (PNJ)

SUKHDEV SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

CWP/18771/2015 · 2026-08-13

Aman Chaudhary

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 Date of decision: 13.08.2026 1. CWP-18771-2015 SUKHDEV SHARMA VS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS 2. CWP-12586-2017 SURENDER SINGH AND ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Karan Garg, Advocate and Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel submit that the present cases were adjourned sine die to await the decision of SLP-27394-2018, which along with a batch of other cases, have been disposed of vide judgment dated 16.04.2026 in Civil Appeal No.1996-2024 titled as Madan Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others. Furthermore, they refer to communication issued by the office of the Chief Secretary, Haryana, dated 11.08.2026 for considering the cases in light of the aforesaid judgment, thus, pray that their cases be also considered and decided in light thereof, for which they will submit a representation giving all relevant details as another similarly situated employee namely Jai Karan who was working as Peon at Bahadurgarh, has been regularized in the year 2024, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, these petitions are hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case petitioners submit a representation within a period of 4 weeks, the ASHOK KUMAR 2026.08.13 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18771-2015 and connected case -2- same be considered and decided, after granting opportunity of hearing to them, expeditiously, in accordance with law, taking note of the submissions made hereinabove and judgment, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file(s). (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 13.08.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.08.13 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document