Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.10959 of 2026
Mini Nayak …. Petitioner Ms. S.P. Sunandini, Advocate -versus- The State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K. Dash, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 16.04.2026
Order No.
01.
1. Heard Ms. S.P. Sunandidni, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. T.K. Dash, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-Opposite Parties.
2. The Petitioner has challenged the notice for delivery of possession dated 02.04.2026 under Annexure-2.
3. It is seen that, the notice dated 02.04.2026 has been passed by the Tahasildar, Raikia consequent to the order passed under Section 3 (A) of the Regulation-II of 1956 passed in R.M.C. Case No.06/2020. It needs to be mentioned here that challenging said
order passed in R.M.C. Case No.06/2020, the Petitioner earlier filed W.P.(C) No.17738 of 2023, which was dismissed vide order dated 01.02.2024. Against the same, the Petitioner has preferred W.A. No.151 of 2024 and the same is pending till date as per the submission of the Petitioner.
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 16-Apr-2026 17:24:27 Signature Not Verified
4. Accordingly, no separate cause of action is seen to maintain present writ petition to challenge the notice dated 02.04.2026. The writ petition is dismissed.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
B.K. Barik