GURBEJSINGH @BHEJA SALVINDARSINGH JAAT-SIKH v. STATE OF GUJARAT
SCR.A/12589/2026 · 2026-09-17
Sanjeev J Thaker
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3562 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3562 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 12589 of 2026 ========================================================== GURBEJSINGH @BHEJA SALVINDARSINGH JAAT-SIKH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MR. MIZAN R PARMAR(20308) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR UTKARSH SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 17/09/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole leave on the ground of filing appeal.
2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service on behalf of the respondent – State.
3. Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.
4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the present petitioner.
5. The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed. p. 2 The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole form 28.09.2026 to 04.10.2026 on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of the parole leave period forthwith. On the voluntary statement made by learned advocate for the applicant, the applicant shall not leave the State of Gujarat during the aforesaid period. Rule is made absolute accordingly. 5.1 Direct service is permitted.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J) SRILATHA