Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35610 (CAL)

TINKU SK @ SAHADAT HOSSAIN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

/1974/2026 · 2026-08-14

Ajay Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.08.2026 Serial no. 48 [Srimanta] Ct. No. - 39 CRM (A) 1974 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/438 of the CrPC in connection with G.R. Case No. 732/2023 arising out of Suti Police Station Case No. 150/2023 dated 27.03.2023 under Sections 186/153A/295A/296/325/353/333/338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 pending before the Learned A.C.J.M. Jangipur, Murshidabad -And- In the matter of : TINKU SK. @ SAHADAT HOSSAIN … … Petitioner Mr. Sourat Nandy, Advocate … … For the Petitioner Mr. P. Karan Singh, Advocate … …For the State 1. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner prays for anticipatory bail on the ground of parity with six other co-accused persons of this case, who were granted anticipatory bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the mob attacked the members of the religious procession and civic volunteers. However, he fairly submits the present petitioner is similarly situated with the other co-accused persons. 3. Having heard the submission of the respective parties and upon consideration of the materials, this Court is of the opinion that custodial detention/interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary. 4. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, TINKU SK. @ SAHADAT HOSSAIN is allowed as 2 the present petitioner stands on the same situated circumstances with accused persons who were granted bail. 5. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of arresting officer on the terms and condition as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 6. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions as imposed by this Court, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 7. The application for anticipatory bail being CRM(A) 1974 of 2026 is, thus, allowed. 8. All concerned parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 9. Criminal Section is directed to supply urgent certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)