Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35607 (CHH)

KU. SANGINI SHIRISH TIWARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/533/2026 · 2026-09-14

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas, Shri Sudhir Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010344302026 2026:CGHC:40155-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 533 of 2026 1 - Ku. Sangini Shirish Tiwari D/o Shirish Tiwari Aged About 24 Years R/o House No. 103, Hanuman Nagar, Kalibadi Chowk Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Police Commissioner Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Station House Officer Police Station Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Ayan Parwez S/o Nahid Parwez Aged About 19 Years R/o Yash Vihar, Moti Nagar, P.S. Tikra Para, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Naitika Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ritika Verma, Panel Lawyer ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 (Division Bench) (Hon’ble Smt. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, Hon’ble Shri Justice Sudhir Kumar) Order on Board 15.09.2026 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Saxena