- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010733712024 NC: 2026:KHC:41978-DB CCC No. 1384 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1384 OF 2024 BETWEEN: K G ARUN KUMAR S/O K.A GAVERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.13 (OLD NO.7), IV CROSS, IV BLOCK, KUMARAPARK (W), BENGALURU - 560020. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. HARSHA VEERANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHIVAPRASAD SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDHYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. SRI. SHREYAS.G.S TAHSILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK, Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010733712024 NC: 2026:KHC:41978-DB CCC No. 1384 of 2024 TALUK OFFICE COMPOUND, YELAHANKA TALUK-560064. BENGALURU. (AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 19.02.2025) …ACCUSED 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, 5TH FLOOR, M.S BUILDING, DR. B.R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU- 560001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR PROFORMA R3-STATE; A1 AND A2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TRY THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT, VIDE ORDER DATED:26.07.2024 PASSED IN WP NO.19957/2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND THEREBY CAUSE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTION ISSUED TO EFFECT THE MUTATION AND TRANSFER KHATA IN FAVOUR OF COMPLAINANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010733712024 NC: 2026:KHC:41978-DB CCC No. 1384 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned Government Advocate appearing for the accused submits that the directions have been complied with. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the complainant. 2. A memo is also placed before the Court, evidencing compliance with the directions and the mutation entry in the RTC. 3. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. 4. The notice issued to accused shall stand discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE AM_List No.: 3 Sl No.: 66