[2026:RJ-JP:10383] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 13226/2025 Ramswaroop Yadav S/o Shri Kanaram Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Manawali Dhani, Gram Nopura, Police Station Govindgarh, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neetu Singh, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Ravindra Faujdar, Ms. Dakshla Shekhawat for Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.104/2025 registered at Police Station Govindgarh (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 3(5), 109(1) and 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. She further submits that in the present matter, no specific injuries have been attributed to the present petitioner and none of the injuries have been opined as dangerous to life. She further submits that the statements of [2026:RJ-JP:10383] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13226/2025] the injured namely Vinod Kumar and Suman have already been recorded before the trial Court and the co-accused Harphool has been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.0.2026. Therefore, on the ground of parity with the co-accused, the present petitioner is also entitled to the grant of bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 23.03.2025 with one criminal antecedent in which he is already bailed out. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the 3rd bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ramswaroop Yadav S/o Shri Kanaram Yadav, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/8