Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 356 (DEL)

ARUN RASTOGI v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

W.P.(C)/2637/2026 · 2026-02-25

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2637/2026 with CM APPL. 12905/2026 ARUN RASTOGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi and Ms. Tamanna Kavdia, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shilpa Ohri, Addl. Standing Counsel for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 25.02.2026 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the demolition carried out by the respondent/MCD yesterday. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous. 3. Consequently, all pending application(s) stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J FEBRUARY 25, 2026 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 13:27:18