Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 356 (CAL)

MUKUNDA DIGAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/24093/2025 · 2026-01-14

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.01.2026 32 sdas WPA 24093 of 2025 Mukunda Digar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Soumak Bera ……. for the petitioner Mr. Santanu Kumar Mitra, Mr. Amartya Pal …….. for the State 1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. The petitioner’s grievance is that he has not been paid the allowances or even any compensatory allowance for rendering service on holidays, including Sundays, seems to be well- founded. However, in spite of repeated services there is no representation on behalf of the respondents no. 3, 4 and 5. 3. The petitioner’s representation dated August 27, 2025, to the Principal of the respondent no. 4, has not been considered in any manner whatsoever. 4. The Principal of the respondent no. 4 is directed to consider the representation dated August 27, 2025, of the petitioner in accordance with the relevant provisions of law and particularly the Burdwan University First Statute, 2 by February 15, 2026, upon giving adequate prior notice of hearing to the petitioner. 5. The Principal will, thereafter, intimate the order to be passed by him in the representation to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from date of hearing. 6. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)