1 CGHC010345842026 2026:CGHC:39795 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4640 of 2026 1 - Gajendra Singh Thakur S/o Lakhan Lal Thakur Aged About 47 Years R/o Madeli, Tahsil - Madeli, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor, Sector-19, North Block, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Janpad Panchayat Chura District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 4 - Jila Panchayat District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer (C E O) Jila Panchayat District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Chura District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 7 - Ashok Dhruw Sarpanch/ Secretary Gram Panchayat Madeli Vikaskhand Chura, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Shankar Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. S. S. Choubey, G.A. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 11/09/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct no 6 to decide Revenue Case no respondent 20260522000005/2025-26 as early as possible/within specific time limit for 60 days (Annexure P-6). 10.3 Any other relief may also be granted to the Petitioner which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Court to respondent No. 6, to decide Revenue Case No. 202605222000005/2025-26 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. His pending representation will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 3 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the concerned respondent No. 6 to decide Revenue Case No. 202605222000005/2025-26 in accordance with law/rules/regulations and in an objective manner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat