Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010277472026 NC: 2026:KHC:43976-DB WP No. 12538 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 12538 OF 2026 (KLGP-) BETWEEN:
1.
J PRABHAVATHI WIFE OF SRINIVASSAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.22, 5TH B CROSS, SARAKKI MAIN ROAD, JP NAGAR 1ST STAGE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR G S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI HAZAR AHAMED S/O RIYAAZ AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO. 91, TMCS LAYOUT, JP NAGAR 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE -560078
2. TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, KEMPEGOWDA RD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, GANDHINAGAR,BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.BYRE GOWDA, AGA FOR R2;
R1 SERVED)
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010277472026 NC: 2026:KHC:43976-DB WP No. 12538 of 2026
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LAND GRABBING COURT IN LGC(P) No. 1105/2017 REJECTING THE PETITIONERs APPLICATION FOR REJECTION OF COMPLAINT VIDE ANNEXURE-A, ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 19.02.2026 passed by the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court, Bengaluru, (CH-2) in LGC(P) No.1105/2017
2. Vide impugned order the application filed by the petitioner under Section 9(3) of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 R/w Section 151 of CPC has been rejected. However, direction has been issued to the Joint Commissioner, Bengaluru South City Corporation, Bengaluru and Commissioner, BDA, Bengaluru, to submit status report with regard to allegations made in the complaint, as to whether there is an encroachment
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010277472026 NC: 2026:KHC:43976-DB WP No. 12538 of 2026
of public road as alleged in the complaint, if there is an encroachment, nature of the encroachment, extent of the encroachment, name and address of the alleged encroachers along with survey sketch, approved layout plan on the next date of hearing.
3. We are of the view, that if the report as directed by the Land Grabbing Court vide impugned order suggests that the petitioner has not encroached upon the government land, the case against the petitioner should be closed and he should be discharged. All would depend on the report to be submitted by the concerned authorities as directed vide impugned order passed by the Land Grabbing Court and therefore, at this stage, we do not want to interfere with the proceedings before the Land Grabbing Court. However, we make it clear that if the report as directed by the Land Grabbing Court suggests that petitioner has not encroached upon the Government Land / Public Land, the proceedings should be dropped against the petitioner.
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010277472026 NC: 2026:KHC:43976-DB WP No. 12538 of 2026
4. With the aforesaid clarification we dispose of this writ petition.
5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12