204 KRISHAN PUNJAB N CORAM: H Present: PARMOD had submitt him directly by this Cour has put in ap 2. to argue the 3. instructions service, it se present revi get it revive 4. 09.01.2026 Sunil Chander IN THE HIGH COURT OF PU AT CHANDIG HAN VERSUS AB NATIONAL BANK AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMO Mr. Tudhsjot Sidhu, Advocate for petitioner *** MOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) On last date of hearing i.e. 30.10 ubmitted that petitioner is not respondin irectly. In pursuance of statement made b ourt to petitioner as well as responden t in appearance. Learned counsel for petitioner su ue the matter till date. In view of fact that when learne ctions and neither petitioner nor respon , it seems that petitioner is no intereste nt revision petition is dismissed for non revived after showing just cause. Pending application(s), if any, st .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : F PUNJAB & HARYANA NDIGARH CR-4814-2000(O&M) Date of decision:09.01.202 ...PETITIONER RSUS ...RESPONDENT ARMOD GOYAL . 30.10.2025, learned counsel for petition onding to letters and notices be issued made by counsel, notices were duly issue pondent, however despite due service non ner submits that he has got no instructio learned counsel for petitioner has got n respondent has appeared even after fre terested in pursuing the case. Accordingl r non-prosecution with liberty to parties any, stand disposed of. (PARMOD GOYAL JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 01.2026 ONER DENT etitioner ssued to y issued none tructions s got no ter fresh rdingly, arties to OYAL) SUNIL CHANDER 2026.01.09 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document