IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4918 of 2026 Decided on: 24th April, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roshan Lal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. B.N. Mehta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge In view of the decision already rendered in Roshan Lal Versus The Union of India and others2, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner intends to avail the remedy in terms of liberty granted to him in the aforesaid decision for the redressal of his grievances. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.386 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 30.06.2025 2 Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 24, 2026 Judge Mukesh