Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3559 (CHH)

HARISHCHAND NISHAD v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1600/2026 · 2026-04-08

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16454 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1600 of 2026 Harishchand Nishad S/o Bhdharu Nishad, Aged About 44 Years President Nishad Raj Mathasya Shakari Samiti Muryadit, Village Guma, Block Arang. District Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through -Secretary, Department Of Fisheries, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Deputy Director (Fisheries)i District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer Fisheries Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 9-4-2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs :- AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.04.10 12:21:10 +0530 2 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and may further be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to take a final decision within a fixed time frame; (Annexure A/1). 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Direct the Respondents to give due preference and fair consideration to the Petitioner cooperative Society of local fishermen; 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to, grant any other relief(s) deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with permission to file a better constituted petition afresh. 3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to allow above limited prayer. 4. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition. 5. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak