Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35585 (KAR)

SRI JAYADEVAIAH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/21602/2026 · 2026-08-06

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476802026 NC: 2026:KHC:41873 WP No. 21602 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 21602 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAYADEVAIAH S/O LATE B.VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. SRI. MANJULA W/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 3. SRI. NEMAIAH S/O LATE B.VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF BIDALOTI VILLAGE, HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 121. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAN PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476802026 NC: 2026:KHC:41873 WP No. 21602 of 2026 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU - 572 101, 3. THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU - 572 101 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 132 5. THE TAHSILDAR, KORATAGERE TALUK, MINI VIDHANASOUDHA, KORATAGERE, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 129 6. SRI. M. VIJAYANANDA, S/O LATE. MAHARUDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BIDALOTI VILLAGE, HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 121 7. REVENUE INSPECTOR HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 112 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476802026 NC: 2026:KHC:41873 WP No. 21602 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR CONNECTED RECORDS PERTAINING TO ANNEXURE-A DATED 12.06.2026, PASSED IN CASE NO. R.P. 245/2025 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, ANNEXURE-B, DATED 18.02.2026 PASSED IN APPEAL NO.675/2025 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, ANNEXURE-C DATED 28.04.2025 PASSED IN CASE NO.RRT(A)(K)218/2022 BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT, ANNEXURE-D DATED 03.06.2022 PASSED IN CASE NO. RRT (DIS/34/2021-22) BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT AND ANNEXURE E ORDER DATED 28.06.2021 PASSED IN RRT(A)(K) 113/2018-19 BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and 7. 2. Heard Sri. Mohan Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N, learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and 7. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the order dated 28.06.2021 passed by respondent No.4-Assistant Commissioner (Annexure-E) would indicate that, the matter has been remitted to respondent No.5-the Tahsildar, to - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476802026 NC: 2026:KHC:41873 WP No. 21602 of 2026 reconsider the issue afresh, after considering the orders that has been passed in LRF CR 303/1974-75. 4. In that view of the matter, as respondent No.4 has remitted the matter to respondent No.5 for reconsideration afresh, I am of the view that no interference is called for in this petition, as respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, has also by impugned order at Annexure-A, confirmed the order passed by respondent No.4. 5. It is made clear that the respondent No.5 shall take decision in the matter at the earliest, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties are concerned, and also it is open for the parties to supply the necessary documents to the respondent No.5 for fresh consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22