JAY KUMAR v. The State of Bihar through C.B.I. Patna
CR. MISC./31985/2023 · 2026-01-16
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35574 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35574 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31985 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2016 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Jay Kumar Son of Sri Kamal Prasad Thakur Resident of mohalla - Indrapuri Colony, Road no. 7A/9, P.S. - Patliputra, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar through C.B.I. Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikalp, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kr. Pandey, Sr.C.G.C. Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, C.G.C. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21 16-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party /C.B.I.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Special Case No. 6/2019, arising out of RC No. 02 (S) 2016, instituted under Sections 120(B)/420 /467/468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and section 13 (2) r/w 13 (1) (D) of P.C. Act.,1988.
3. The petitioner Jay Kumar, who is a practicing Advocate of this Court, during Court proceeding in Cr.Misc. No. 18211 of 2016, played fraud and misled the Hon’ble Court by placing on record a forged & fabricated Vakalatnama by forging a signature of one Ran Vijay Singh, who had already departed to heavenly abode, and produced a forged web copy of
order dated 25.02.2016 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 4198 of 2016 by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31985 of 2023(21) dt.16-01-2026 2/2 a coordinate Bench of this Court to show that the co-accused Munna Kumar, having identical allegation, had already been granted bail, whereas Cr.Misc. No. 4198 of 2016 was filed by one Nagina Rai, not Munna Kumar.
4. In the facts & circumstances of the case and nature of accusation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.
anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T