D/L65 25.08.2026 Bpg. Partly Allowed C.R.M. (A) 2761 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Murarai Police Station Case No.137 of 2026 dated 16.05.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/74/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Corresponding to Sections 341/323/325/326/354/34of the Indian Penal Code, 1860); Premananda Fulmali @ Dablu Fulmali & Ors. Versus State of West Bengal Mr. Abdur Rakib Mr. Saikat Chatterji Mr. Mojahid Mehedi. …for the petitioners. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Mukesh Kr. Gupta. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case as there has been neighbouring dispute. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the injured sustained severe injuries and two stitches were administered. I have taken into account the medical report which reflects the overt act of petitioner no.4, namely, Subrata Fulmali @ Kablu Fulmali. In view of the overt act of the petitioner no.4, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 2 So far as the petitioner nos.1, 2 and 3 are concerned, they were present but there are no overt act assigned to them. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner nos. 1, and 3 are allowed. In the event of arrest, the petitioner no.1, namely, Premananda Fulmali @ Dablu Fulmali, petitioner no.2, namely, Suben Fulmali and the petitioner no.3, namely, Subir Mondal shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is in progress, the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall report to the investigating officer of the case within a period of 10 days from date and thereafter on all subsequent dates fixed by the investigating officer of the case for the sake of investigation. Thus, CRM(A) 2761 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3