RAMACHANDRAPPA @ RAMACHANDRAPPA B H v. SMT MANJAMMA
MFA/3687/2020 · 2026-08-10
Rajesh Rai K
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35573 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35573 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010168132020 NC: 2026:KHC:43038 MFA No. 3687 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3687 OF 2020 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
1.
RAMACHANDRAPPA @ RAMACHANDRAPPA B.H., S/O HOTTEPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O HUNASHIHALLI, POST:SASVEHALLI, TALUK: HONNALLI, DISTRICT: DAVANAGERE.
2. SRINIVAS S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA EKKEGONDI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC : DRIVER R/O. TYAGADAKATTE, TALUK: HONNALLI, DISTRICT : DAVANAGERE-577217. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. THUSHANATH C.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT. MANJAMMA W/O. KARIYAPPA KURIYAVAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010168132020 NC: 2026:KHC:43038 MFA No. 3687 of 2020
2. RAGANATH S/O. KARIYAPPA KURIYAVAR, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
3. SUSMITA, D/O. KARIYAPPA KURIYAVAR AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, OCC : STUDENT
4. CHAITRA D/O. KARIYAPPA KURIYAVAR AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT ALL ARE RESIDING AT: KAMALAPUR, HIREKERUR TALUK, DISTRICT HAVERI-581111. …RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R4 SD) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.10.02.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.88/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AMACT, HIREKERUR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010168132020 NC: 2026:KHC:43038 MFA No. 3687 of 2020
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo seeking permission to retire from the case, along with the intimation notice sent by him to the appellants on 19.06.2026, the original RPAD receipts, and the acknowledgments evidencing receipt of the said notice by the appellants on
22.06.2026. He submits that, despite having received the notice and communication, the appellants have failed to provide any instructions to him and, as such, he is unable to proceed with the case. Since the notice sent by the learned counsel has been duly received by the appellants, he is permitted to retire from the case.
2. Further, as the notice issued by the learned counsel was received by the appellants on 22.06.2026 itself, sufficient opportunity has been provided to them to prosecute the appeal. Despite the same, the appellants have failed to engage the
- 4 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010168132020 NC: 2026:KHC:43038 MFA No. 3687 of 2020 services of any other counsel. Hence, it can be presumed that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3