CRM-M-42589 IN THE (238+110 PARWINDER STATE OF PU CORAM: HO Present: Mr Mr *** MANISHA BA CRM-32002-20 1. Ap exceptions and placed on record CRM-M-42589 1. Th Section 483 of grant of regula registered unde Station Kartarpu 2. B that the aforeme 42589-2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH 8+110) CR Da DER SINGH @ PINDER AND AN Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MAN Mr. Ravi Malhotra, Advocate for th Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Pun *** A BATRA, J. (ORAL) 2026 Application for placing on record s and the document annexed with th record as Annexure P6. 42589-2026 The instant petition has been fi 83 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 202 regular bail in case arising out of F under Sections 302, 323, 34, 342, 1 artarpur, District Jalandhar. Brief facts relevant for the purpose forementioned FIR was registered on t JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-42589-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.08.2026 D ANOTHER ... Petitioners ...Respondent MANISHA BATRA e for the petitioners , Punjab record is allowed subject to all just ith the application is ordered to be een filed by the petitioners under ta, 2023 (for short “BNS”) seeking t of FIR No.116 dated 18.07.2021 342, 148, 149, 201 of IPC at Police urpose of disposal of this petition are ed on the basis of statement recorded s l just to be nder king 2021 olice n are rded AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-42589 by the compla Baljinder Singh her son, she had a de-addiction c she had given helping in de- visit her son fo Nihang along w that her son had rushed to the D fled away. She alleging that he she prayed for t 3. Aft initiated. Durin statement to th Chauhan and nominated as ac under Section declared proc arrested on 21.0 42589-2026 (O&M) 2 omplainant Balbir Kaur, alleging Singh was addicted to consumption o he had handed over his custody to Suk ction centre in the outskirts of Village given a sum of Rs.10,000/- to Sukh -addiction of her son who had as son for at least 20 days. On 18.07.2 long with some unknown persons cam on had died by suffering heart attack the Dera and in the meanwhile, Sukh y. She noticed multiple injuries on th hat her son had been killed by Sukha d for taking action in the matter. After registration of FIR, inv During investigation, the complaina to the effect that the present petitio and Somraj was having hand in the d as accused. The petitioners could no ction 82 of Cr.P.C. were initiated proclaimed offenders vide order da n 21.08.2025. Investigation qua them ing therein that her younger son ption of intoxicant capsules. To save to Sukha Nihang who was operating illage Pattar Kalan. On 08.07.2021, Sukha Nihang for the purpose of had asked the complainant to not to 8.07.2021, the above named Sukha ns came to her house and informed attack in the same morning. She had , Sukha Nihang and his companions s on the dead body of her son. By Sukha Nihang and his accomplices, , investigation proceedings were plainant recorded a supplementary petitioners along with Daljit Singh in the death of her son. They were uld not be apprehended. Proceedings tiated against them and they were der dated 23.05.2022. They were them now stands concluded. son save ating 021, e of ot to ukha rmed had ions . By lices, were ntary ingh were ings were were AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-42589 4. It i been falsely imp the complainant upon circumsta collected by the subject offences Sukha Nihang neither the com Kumar, Lakha version. They commission of conclude. No us more. Their ant conditions to be be released on b 5. P report has argue with the fact th proclaimed offe 6. Th counsel for the p 42589-2026 (O&M) 3 It is argued by learned counsel for ely implicated in this case on the basis lainant which is not based on any conv cumstantial evidence and no incri by the investigating agency to connec ences. No specific role has been attri ihang and Somraj who faced trial ha e complainant nor material witnesse Lakha Singh and Jaspal Singh hav They did not implicate the petitione on of subject offences. The trial w . No useful purpose would be served by eir antecedents are clean. They are re s to be imposed upon them. It is, thus d on bail. Per contra, learned State counsel s argued that keeping in view the grav fact that the petitioners avoided the d offenders, they do not deserve to be This Court has heard the rival s or the parties at considerable length. sel for the petitioners that they have basis of supplementary statement of y convincing material. The case rests incriminating material has been onnect them with the commission of n attributed to them. The co-accused rial have already been acquitted as itnesses Amandeep Singh, Hardeep h have supported the prosecution titioners and any other accused in rial will take considerable time to rved by detaining him in custody any ready to abide by the terms and is, thus, argued that they deserves to unsel while relying upon the status he gravity of the allegations coupled their arrest and were declared a e to be extended benefit of bail. rival submissions made by learned have nt of rests been on of used d as deep ution d in e to any and es to tatus pled ed a rned AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-42589 7. Th unlawful assem thereof, is furth Annexure P-3 accused Somraj reveals that the version of the p in commission above named w be applicable t commenced, ho specific injury direct evidence custody, this Co out a case for petitioners are personal bonds each to the satis and on the follo 42589-2026 (O&M) 4 The petitioners are alleged to hav assembly with the co-accused and in s further alleged to have caused the de 3 is copy of judgment of acquit omraj and Baljit Singh @ Sukha Nih at the complainant and other material the prosecution and did not implicat ission of subject offences. Though th med witnesses in the trial of the co-ac able to the present petitioners again ed, however, given the nature of the a njury or weapon had been attributed idence to the occurrence and the peri this Court is of the considered opinion e for release on bail. Accordingly, th s are ordered to be admitted to ba bonds as well as surety bonds by tw satisfaction of learned trial Court/CJ e following conditions:- (i) The petitioners shall visit the the first Monday of every altern the case. The SHO concerned sh case, the petitioners does not ab to have formed membership of an nd in prosecution of common object the death of son of the complainant. acquittal recorded in favour of co- ha Nihang and a perusal of the same aterial witnesses did not support the plicate the aforementioned accused ugh the statements recorded by the accused cannot be considered to against whom trial has separately f the allegations to the effect that no ibuted to the petitioners, there is no e period spent by the petitioners in pinion that the petitioners have made gly, the petition is allowed and the to bail subject to their furnishing by two sureties in the like amount urt/CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned isit the concerned Police Station on alternative month during the trial of rned shall record his presence and in not abide by this condition, then he f an bject nant. - same t the used y the ed to ately at no is no in ade d the hing ount rned n on al of nd in n he AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-42589 42589-2026 (O&M) 5 shall intimate the trial Court wh the bail of the petitioners on this (ii) The petitioners shall not di inducement, threat or promise t the facts of the case or tamper w any manner whatsoever. (iii) The petitioners shall not circumstance without permission (iv) The petitioners shall appear hearing. (v) The petitioners shall provide as present address before the lea furnishing of bonds and shall informing the trial Court. (vi) The petitioners shall also gi PAN Card if any and details of to the learned trial Court at the ti in case, any change in their mob then they shall inform about the in advance and shall keep thei times. urt who shall be at liberty to cancel n this ground alone. not directly or indirectly make any mise to any person acquainted with per with the evidence of the case in l not leave the country under any ission of the learned trial Court. ppear before each and every date of rovide his permanent address as well the learned trial Court at the time of shall not change the same without also give copy of their Aadhar Card, ils of their mobile phone number(s) t the time of furnishing of bonds and mobile phone number takes place, ut the same to the learned trial Court p their mobile phone switch on all cel any with se in any te of well e of thout ard, er(s) s and lace, urt n all AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-42589 8. In conditions, the seeking cancella 9. It i for the purpose bearing on the m 10. Sin any, is rendered 07.08.2026 Amit Sharma 42589-2026 (O&M) 6 (vii) The petitioners shall depos the learned trial Court. In the eventuality of breach of s, the respondent-State shall be at li ancellation of the bail. It is made clear that any observati urpose of deciding the present petitio n the merits of the case. Since the main petition has been al ndered infructuous. (M Whether speaking/reasoned:- Whether reportable:- Yes/No deposit their passport, if any, with ch of any of the aforementioned e at liberty to move an application servation made herein above is only petition and the same shall have no been allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE - Yes/No with oned ation only e no n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.