1 CGHC010301252026 2026:CGHC:40193 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7355 of 2026 Chhottelal S/o Chaitram Rohidas Aged About 38 Years R/o Khaija, Bhatapara, Thana Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicant : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Laxmin Kashyap, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge Order on Board 15/09/2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 62/2026, registered at Police Station : Excise Circle Baloda, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the Police of Police Station, Excise Circle Baloda, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 received a secret information from the informant and on the basis of the said information conducted raid and have seized 6 liters of handmade liquor from the possession of the applicant. Thereafter, Police has registered an offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act against the present applicant. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and that the alleged liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that, in the present case, the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and so far as the criminal antecedents of the applicant are concerned that Crime No. 315/2014 registered against the applicant has already been disposed of, whereas Crime No. 281/2022 registered against him is still pending. The applicant is in jail since 13.07.2026 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant and submits that in the present case, charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents. She further submits that from the possession of the present applicant, 6 liters of handmade liquor was seized and as such he is a habitual offender therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case- diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, 3 nature and gravity of the allegations alleged against the applicant, the criminal antecedents of the applicant, the quantity of liquor seized from his possession, the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court, the period of incarceration since 13.07.2026 and the fact that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the applicant 7. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant is allowed. It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- (i) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court; (ii) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, & (iii) he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance. dorthwith. - S/- Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Kunal