1 CGHC010294822026 2026:CGHC:40189 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6941 of 2026  Priyanka Kalse D/o Rajendra Kalse, Aged About 20 Years R/o Pragati, Nagar, Darri, Thana And Tahsil Darri, District- Korba (C.G.) ... Applicant versus  State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Chowki C S E B. P.S. Civil Line Rampur, District- Korba (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Non-Applicant : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15.09.2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 643/2026 registered at Police Station – Rampur, District Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(5) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.09.15 14:07:17 +0530 2 2. According to the prosecution's story, applicant, who was an employee of Abhivriddhi Financial Services grabbed Rs. 28,880/- from the complainant in the name of processing her loan application. When she failed to refund the afore-stated amount or provide the loan as promised, FIR was lodged by the complainant on 09.07.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the present applicant has no criminal antecedents and she is in jail since 14.07.2026, conclusion of the trial may take some time, therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the present applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that applicant has grabbed money from various persons and charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case that the applicant has no criminal antecedents. Also considering the fact that in the present bail application the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and the present applicant is in jail since 14.07.2026, conclusion of the trial may take some more time, therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the present applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 3 7. It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, she shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- (a) she shall make himself available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required; (b)she shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court; and (c) she shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial. The observation made hereinabove is for the purpose of deciding this bail application only, the learned trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits. - Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a