Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:13394 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.244 of 2026 Date of decision: 24.04.2026 Savita and others ….Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Aanchal Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 22.04.2026 along with Office Order dated 08.04.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to judgment dated 26.11.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.18305 of 2025, the case of the petitioners, has been considered and decided by the respondent-department, i.e. Director of School Education, Shimla by way of passing detailed office order dated 08.04.2026.
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge April 24, 2026
(reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
2