ATAL PANDEY @ PRADEEP and Others v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
MCRC/5241/2026 · 2026-09-14
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35520 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35520 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010224672026
2026:CGHC:40281
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5241 of 2026 1 - Atal Pandey @ Pradeep And Others S/o Lalman Pandey Aged About 35 Years R/o Odiadih Police Station Patti District Pratapgarh (Uttar Pradesh) Current Address- Pandey Flywood Factory Complex Dumardih
Police
Station
Utai
District
Durg
C.G. 2 - Rahul Singh S/o Tejbhan Singh Aged About 35 Years (Not Mentioned In The Order Sheet) R/o Khohar Post Goiya Police Station Badegarh, District Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) Current Address- Pandey Flywood Factory Complex Dumardih, Police Station Utai District Durg C.G. 3 - Akshya Kumar S/o Dinesh Yadav Aged About 23 Years (Not Mentioned In The Order Sheet) R/o Bhuvapur Police Station Pandarka District Patna -Bihar Curent Address- Pandey Flywood Factory Complex Dumardih Police Station Utai District Durg C.G.
--- Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Utai District Durg C.G.
--- Non-applicant(s) WITH MCRC No. 7798 of 2026 1 - Anjani Singh @ Manish Kumar S/o Dinesh Singh Aged About 43 Years R/o Baudai, P.S. Jigna, Distt. Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Current Address, Pandey Flywood Factory Complex, Dumardih, P.S. Utai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---Applicant(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. Utai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
--- Non-applicant(s) WITH Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.09.15 17:12:57 +0530
2 MCRC No. 5746 of 2026 1 - Amarnath Prajapati S/o Paramhansh Prajapati Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Lukdi Nippy Babu, Police Station Gol Bazar, District Gorakhpur (U.P.) Present R/o, Pandey Flywood Factory Complex, Dumardih, P.S. Utai, District Durg (C.G.) (Details Of Applicant Not Mentioned Completely In The Cause Title Of The Impugned Order)
---Applicant(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, P.S. Utai, District Durg (C.G.)
--- Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : Mr. Gurudev I. Sharan, Advocate along with Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 15.09.2026 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respective applicants seek permission of this Court to withdraw these applications with liberty to revive at appropriate stage. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Permission granted. 4) Consequently, these bail applications stand rejected as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a