MADAN GOPAL (SINCE DECEASED) AND ANOTHER v. NARAD AND 13 OTHERS
A227/6194/2026 · 2026-05-04
Vikas Budhwar
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6194 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard.
2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents.
3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition is for a direction to the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) Bansi Siddharth Nagar to decide the Original Suit no.96 of 1990 'Madan Gopal and another Vs. Narad and others', expeditiously as possible as within stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court..
4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.
5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) Bansi Siddharth Nagar to decide the Original Suit no.96 of 1990 'Madan Gopal and another Vs. Narad and others' , expeditiously, preferably within one year, strictly in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments, subject to legal impediment. In case, any adjournment is accorded, same should not be for more than 15 days at a stretch. May 5, 2026 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Vikas Budhwar,J.) Madan Gopal (Since Deceased) And Another .....Petitioner(s) Narad And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad