24.08.2026 Item No. 19 Ct. No. 39 C.R.M.(A) 2027 of 2026 AN (REJECTED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with N.T.S. Police Station Case No. 136 of 2025 dated 06.11.2025 under Sections 318(4) / 336(3) / 338 / 340(2) / 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1639 of 2025 now pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paschim Bardhaman. In the matter of : Sri Anay Debnath … Petitioner. Mr. Subrata Bhattacharyya …for the Petitioner. Mr. Shourjyo Mukherjee Ms. Sanjana Jha …for the State. 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is the owner of the land who sold the property alongwith other co-sharers. This is entirely a civil dispute. He prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioner on any terms and conditions. 2. On the other hand, learned advocate representing the State produces the memo of evidence and the case diary and relies upon the statement of the witnesses recorded and submits that the property was mortgaged with a bank and due to non-payment of loan amount, the bank had taken steps over the said property. They have cheated both the complainant and the bank authority. He opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 3. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusing the materials available on record, the case diary, including the statement of the witnesses recorded, this Court finds that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner considering the role of the petitioner in committing the offence. 4. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail in favour of the present petitioner, and the prayer for anticipatory bail is thus, rejected. 5. C.R.M.(A) 2027 of 2026 stands dismissed. 6. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 7. The concerned Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) 2 3