1 CGHC010350972026 2026:CGHC:40175 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8531 of 2026 • Takeshwar @ Taakeshwar Nishad S/o Shatruhan Nishad Aged About 22 Years R/o Ward No. 06, Nevra Mandi Chowk, P.S. Tilda-Nevra, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Tilda- Nevra, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For State : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15.09 .2026 1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 243/2025 registered at Police Station Tilda- Nevra, District Raipur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 296, 351(3), 109(1) of B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 25 & 27 of Arms Act. 2. The earlier bail application of the applicant being MCRC No. 9129 of 2025 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 13.11.2025. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the complainant has made complaint to the concerned police station alleging inter-alia that on the date of incident there was simple dispute arose in between applicant and SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.09.15 17:59:14 +0530 2 complainant regarding previous enmity and thereafter, the applicant has committed marpeet with the complainant by knife, resultant, the complainant has received simple injury. Based upon the such complaint concerned police has been registered crime against the applicant for the aforesaid offences. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the present applicant has falsely been implicated. He further submits that after rejection of the first bail application 7 witnesses have been examined out of 10 witnesses and there are contradictions and omissions in their evidence. He would further submit that the present applicant is in jail since 09.06.2025, charge sheet has also been filed and it will take time to conclude the trial. Thus, he would pray for grant of bail to the applicant. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose the bail application. She would further submit that there is no change in circumstances and thus, the application is liable to be rejected. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 7. First bail application was dismissed on merits & there is no change in circumstance and further considering the allegations leveled against the present applicant, I am not inclined to allow this application. Accordingly, the instant application for the grant of bail is rejected. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant