Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35499 (PNJ)

MUNNI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/23538/2026 · 2026-08-18

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

!"#"$% & & ' ' ' ' &&&&&""$( )** )** )** )** ** ** ** ** +&#,$-$# '% '% '% '% ./'&* ./'&* ./'&* ./'&* * * * * (#$% '(&#0"#0"12-3! (0,""$(& '(&Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** * * * * 2&4(56 2&4(56 2&4(56 2&4(56 1. This Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing the Final Revised Result dated 28.05.2026 (Annexure P-13) qua Category No.1 of Advertisement No.2/2023 dated 21.02.2023 for the post of TGT-English, and for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to include the petitioner’s name/roll number in the final selection list and consider him for appointment in accordance with merit, rules and law. The petitioner also seeks an interim direction restraining the respondents from proceeding further PARUL VERMA 2026.08.19 14:42 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment with the selection/appointment process for the said post pursuant to the impugned result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attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment #7A8"-(,(#$"$--&&4$$:7( 62B0"!00# $A$!$#"-(-"55-&20( (2#7A8"#00,""$(2 03"$< 75 "55-05"<"A"5">!("("$-#!7(-8(1#0"<0(0$0 $" "-!7 20#A$"55<55>-$"-!$#"-("$ (#5!"$$- ,,"$8$& & /($-!7$#5 (0,""$(0"##<#7A8"#0 0 ,""$( B75- A #"# "- " -"(!"$ "# "##7- (#,$-$ &9!8,$70(">-!"-0(,(#$"$--&& 4$$:7( 62A>,##"$<#,1"$<(-("$"8A7$-8$$(& 4. Notice of motion. 5. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. AG, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that, admittedly, the petitioner has not annexed the requisite certificate in terms of Clause 9.5 of the advertisement (supra), which requires a candidate to obtain a fresh/latest BCA/BCB certificate in terms of the instructions dated 22.03.2022. He further submits that a perusal of Annexure P-3 indicates that it is a caste certificate and not an income certificate, which is required for ascertaining whether the petitioner belongs to the creamy layer or not. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra in view of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Divya v. Union of India, 2024 (1) SCC 448, and the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Haryana Public Service Commission v. Pardeep Kumar and others, LPA-1397- 2025. However, he submits that he has no objection in case a direction is PARUL VERMA 2026.08.19 14:42 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment = issued to respondent No.3/competent authority to consider and decide the representation dated 12.06.2026 (Annexure P-15) by passing a speaking order within a stipulated period. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of and respondent No.3/competent authority is directed to hear and decide the representation dated 12.06.2026 (Annexure P-15), filed by the petitioner in a time bound manner and pass a speaking order, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same be granted to him forthwith by respondents/competent authority. 8. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. & & 4* 6 4* 6 4* 6 4* 6 00(#,1"$<9(#$-&% #9 00(,(A5&% #9 PARUL VERMA 2026.08.19 14:42 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment