HARPREET KAUR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/7651/2026 · 2026-08-13
Nidhi Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35487 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35487 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-7651
IN THE HIG
115+239
Harpreet Ka
State of Hary
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP CM-9220-C
with Section Council (NB as responden
of responden application i
application, (NBTC) and hereby imple 651-2026 (O&M)
-1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA
CWP Date o
eet Kaur and others
Versus
f Haryana and others
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Nikhil Lather, Advocate for
Mr. Teevar Sharma, DAG, Hary
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) CWP-2026
Prayer in this application filed Section 151 CPC is for impleading il (NBTC) and Haryana State Blood T ondent Nos. 7 and 8 respectively.
Notice of the application.
Mr. Teevar Sharma, DAG, Hary pondent-State and has pleaded ‘no o ation is allowed.
Heard.
In view of the above and for ation, the same is allowed; and Nation C) and Haryana State Blood Transf impleaded as respondent Nos. 7 and
D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7651-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.08.2026
.… Petitioners
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ate for the petitioners. , Haryana. n filed under Order I Rule 10 read ading National Blood Transfusion lood Transfusion Council (HSBTC) , Haryana, accepts notice on behalf ‘no objection’ in case, the present d for the reasons mentioned in the National Blood Transfusion Council Transfusion Council (HSBTC) are 7 and 8, respectively. read sion
half sent the ncil are RISHU KATARIA 2026.08.18 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgmdent.
CWP-7651
taken on reco CWP-7651
1.
the Constitu Mandamus petitioners respondents provisions o advertisemen situated em Manipur, v regularizatio Court vide ju of writ peti Singh vs. St employees w Haryana an 31.12.2025
2.
submits that ratio of judg Joginder Si petitioners
disposed of 651-2026 (O&M)
-2-
Amended memo of parties filed on record. 7651-2026 Prayer in the present writ petiti onstitution of India is for issuance us directing the respondents to who are working for more t dents and are selected and appoin ions of Article 16 of the Constit isement and duly constituted selectio d employees have already been r ur, vide Annexure P-18; and the rization has already been mandated b vide judgment dated 31.12.2025 (Ann it petitions lead case being CWP-31 s. State of Haryana and others, wh yees who do not fall under the poli na and have rendered services for 2025 have been granted the benefit of
At the very outset, learned c ts that case of all the 175 petitioners h f judgment of this Court dated 31.1 r Singh’s case (supra). It is ac ners would be satisfied at this stag ed of with a direction to the respond
s filed along with the application is t petition filed under Article 226 of uance of a writ in the nature of regularize the service of the ore than last 10 years with the ppointed in consonance with the onstitution by way of a proper election committee when similarly een regularized in the State of d the issue with regard to the ated by a co-ordinate Bench of this (Annexure P-20) passed in a bunch 31304-2025 titled as Joginder , wherein in para No. 47 even the e policies framed by the State of s for more than 10 years as on efit of regularization. rned counsel for the petitioners ners herein is fully covered by the d 31.12.2025 (Annexure P-20) in is accordingly prayed that the s stage if the present petition is spondents to consider and decide n is 6 of e of the the the
larly of the this nch er the e of on RISHU KATARIA 2026.08.18 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgmdent.
CWP-7651
claim of the bound mann Joginder Sin
3.
‘no objectio petitioners counsel that ascertained continuous regularizatio
4.
matter and Civil Writ P Haryana/con claim of pe thereupon w mind the ju (supra).
5.
13.08.2026 rishu
651-2026 (O&M)
-3- of the petitioners qua regularization manner in terms of judgment of this r Singh’s case (supra).
Learned counsel for the respond bjection’ in case, the prayer made at this stage, is accepted. It is als el that the service tenure of each of ained individually as to whether they uous and satisfactory service to rization.
Accordingly, without commen and with the consent of learned cou Writ Petition stands disposed of with na/concerned Department to accord of petitioners for regularization; a pon within a period of 08 months fr the judgment passed by this Court
Pending application(s) if any als 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
ization of their service in a time of this Court (Annexure P-20) in espondent-State submits that he has made by learned counsel for the t is also submitted by learned State ach of 175 petitioners needs to be er they have rendered 10 years of ce to make them eligible for mmenting on the merits of the ed counsel for the parties, present with a direction to the State of ccord fresh consideration to the ion; and pass a speaking order from today, while keeping in Court in Joginder Singh’s case any also stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No has the tate be s of for RISHU KATARIA 2026.08.18 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgmdent.