1 CGHC010064902023 2026:CGHC:39843 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1001 of 2023 1 - Itwar Singh S/o Sonu Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Chakarda Patwari Halka No.11 Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2 - Panch Ram S/o Sanu Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Chakarda Patwari Halka No.11 Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3 - Bhagat Ram S/o Kanhai Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chakarda, Patwari Halka No. 11, Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ram Lal S/o Kanhai Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Chakarda, Patwari Halka No. 11, Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 5 - Dular Singh S/o Bhagat Ram Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chakarda, Patwari Halka No. 11, Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 6 - Bhagwan S/o Mani Ram Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Chakarda, Patwari Halka No. 11, Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.09.11 18:02:57 +0530 2 7 - Sukhram S/o Mani Ram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Chakarda, Patwari Halka No. 11, Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 8 - Pilau S/o Mani Ram Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Chakarda, Patwari Halka No. 11, Revenue Circle, Kendudand, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Ms. Ankita Goswami, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 11.09.2026 1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, in view of the instructions received, the petitioners do not wish to prosecute the present writ petition and, therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. 3 Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh