Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010137682026
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 432 of 2026 Bihari Udasi S/o Amardas Udasi Aged About 66 Years R/o Chakradhar Nagar, Sindhi Colony Raigarh (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Lokmanya Tilak School Raigarh Through Its President Chakradhar Nagar, Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Principal Lokmanya Tilak School Chakradhar Nagar, Sindhi Colony Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Sachiv Lokmanya Tilak School Chakradhar Nagar, Sindhi Colony Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Bihari Rajput S/o Revachand Rajput, Aged About 55 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As Chaitan ) R/o Sindhi Colony Chakradhar Nagar Raigarh Kaserpara Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Chaitan Das Rajput S/o Revachand Rajput Aged About 64 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As Bihari ) R/o Kaserpara Chakradhar Nagar, Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent No. 4 and 5 : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.09.11 17:51:55 +0530
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order on Board 11.09.2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present writ petition is arising out of the appellate proceeding, whereas the appellate proceeding has already been terminated and the matter has been remitted back to the learned trial Court and therefore, he may be permitted to not press the present writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy of filing appropriate application for impleadment of necessary party before the learned trial Court.
2.
Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 4 and 5 is not opposes the withdrawal of the present writ petition, however, he would submit that the application, so filed by the petitioner before the learned trial Court, may be decided on its own merits.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, however, he is at liberty to make his application before the learned trial Court and the learned trial Court is directed to decided the application filed by the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika