Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:13399 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.2150 of 2026
Decided on: 24.04.2026 Smt. Anita Devi
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. … Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Verma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:-
“i. to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in nature thereof to the respondent State to quash the impugned Annexure P-3, whereby the petitioner is superannuated at the age of 58 years instead of permitting her to discharge her duties till the age of 60 years.
ii. to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in nature thereof to the respondent State to reinstate the petitioner as Peon-cum-Chowkidar and pay emoluments and other financial benefits due to the petitioner with all consequential due to the petitioner with all consequential benefits for not allowing him to serve till the age of 60 years.”
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
( 2026:HHC:13399 )
3.
In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the final judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Satya Devi’s case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge April 24, 2026 (mamta)