KONDETI SATYANARAYANA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/1510/2023 · 2026-06-22
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3546 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3546 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement
: 23-06-2026 Date of uploading
: 30.06.2026
APHC010031102023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1510/2023 Between:
1. KONDETI SATYANARAYANA, S/O. AMMIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC . SERVICE, R/O. D.NO.1-39, ANJANEYA STREET, MUNAMARRU, PENUGONDA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND, REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, ELURU DISTRICT (FORMER WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT) AT ELURU, ANDHRA
2
PRADESH STATE. 5. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ELURU DISTRICT (FORMER WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT) AT ELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 6. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, REP. BY GENERAL MANAGER, ELURU DISTRICT (FORMER WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT) AT ELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 7. SRI AGASTYA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., WG NO.5264 REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, VADALI, PENUGONDA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in not enhancing the super annuantion age of the petitioner from 60 years to 62 years in par with Government employees as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to GO.MS No.15 dated 31.01.2022 and consequently direct the respondents herein to enhance the super annuation age of the petitioner from 60 years to 62 years as per GO.MS No.15 dated 31.01.2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents herein to continue the service of the petitioner in the 7th respondent co-operative Society in consonance with GO.MS.
No. 15, Finance (HR.IV FR Fir, LR) Dept., dated 31.01.2022, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.06.2026 rsd
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
4
12 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1510/2023
Date: 23.06.2026 rsd