Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3545 (AP)

SRINIVASA RAO RAMISETTY v. SRI S SURESH KUMAR (IAS)

CC/111/2026 · 2026-06-24

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J C.C.No.111_2026 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010006592026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 111/2026 Between: 1. SRINIVASA RAO RAMISETTY, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCU. CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO.3-16, MAIN ROAD, INAVOLU, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.(R.I) 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. (R-2) 3. SRI J RAMA APPALA NAIDU, WORKING AS COMMISSIONER, TENALI MUNICIPALITY, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.(R-3) 4. SRI P SRIKANTH, WORKING AS MUNICIPAL ENGINEER GRADE-1, TENALI MUNICIPALITY, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.(R-4) ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 HN, J C.C.No.111_2026 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents herein, and punish them for willful, deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble court in W.P.No.28706 of 2025 dt.27.10.2025, under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt cf Courts Act, 1971, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GNANESWARA RAO MITTIREDDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2. 3. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI 3 HN, J C.C.No.111_2026 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survives for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:25.06.2026 NKA 4 HN, J C.C.No.111_2026 125 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 111 of 2026 Date: 25.06.2026 NKA