M/S FHONE FIX v. SAMADHAN MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL M S E F C CHHATTISGARH
WPC/4626/2026 · 2026-09-09
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35441 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35441 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010350942026
2026:CGHC:39625
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4626 of 2026 1 - M/s Fhone Fix A Firm Duly Registered As Micro Enterprise Under The Provisions Of The Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act 2006 Having Its Registered Office At Fhonefix Godown, Beside E O S Cinema, Bazarpara, Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 494226 Represented Through Its Proprietor Shubham Sancheti. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Samadhan Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council M S E F C Chhattisgarh Through Director, Directorate Of Industries, Udyog Bhavan,
Ring
Road, Telibandha,
Raipur
Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Sukma, District Sukma Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector And Chairman, Managing Committee, District Mineral Foundation (D M F), Collectorate Campus, District Sukma Chhattigarh. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Industrial Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT
2 For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Krati Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 10/09/2026
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
“a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No. 1, i.e., the Learned Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC), Chhattisgarh, to expeditiously decide the pending Claim Petition No- ED-2026-0019837 of 2026 filed by the Petitioner under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, within a time-bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. b. Pass any other order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any specific order, but is seeking a direction from this Court to respondent No. 1 to consider and decide the petitioner’s pending Claim Petition No. ED-2026-0019837 of 2026, filed under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. 3
3.
Learned counsel for the State submits that, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent-authorities to consider and decide the petitioner’s pending Claim Petition No. ED-2026-0019837 of 2026, filed under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, he has no objection to the said limited prayer. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, instead of keeping this petition pending, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage by directing respondent No. 1 to consider and decide the petitioner’s pending Claim Petition No. ED-2026- 0019837 of 2026, filed under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, in accordance with law, within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat